No. 21-5647
Adolphus Symonette v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 2255-proceeding certificate-of-appealability constitutional-rights district-court-discretion habeas-corpus post-offense-rehabilitation reasonable-jurists resentencing sentencing
Latest Conference:
2021-10-08
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether reasonable jurists would find the district court's decision to vacate Count 3 of the second superseding indictment while simultaneously denying a full resentencing hearing with petitioner being present as to Counts 1 and 2 debatable or wrong?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether reasonable jurists would find the district court's decision to vacate Count 3 of the second superseding indictment while simultaneously denying a full resentencing hearing with petitioner being present as to Counts 1 and 2 debatable or wrong?
Docket Entries
2021-10-12
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
2021-09-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2021-08-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 13, 2021)
Attorneys
Adolphus Symonette
Ronald S Chapman — Ronald S. Chapman, Petitioner
United States of America
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent