No. 21-5646

Peter Klah v. Andrew J. Bruck, Acting Attorney General of New Jersey, et al.

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2021-09-10
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights digital-contacts due-process ineffective-counsel jurisdiction-analysis online-interactions personal-jurisdiction prosecutorial-misconduct right-to-counsel standing
Latest Conference: 2021-11-05
Question Presented (from Petition)

Trial Court Erred in Denyng motion to Suppress hear case Prosecutor's comments During his opening statement nAhmeony he Co Deat Hoe Asserted his Seventyfive-year Sentence was excessive .The trial Court Erred in Permitting the state to Admit Crime scenePhoto thout laying a Proper fourdation. Counsel was ineffective When he falled to Call Witnesses Coe b Coune W effectiralser that Caut otheur narge: t Prosecua Coneiecino e vouchins for the Polie officer Arosecor Saement No othergunit rd Could have Commited the murder B Prosecutor Speculate that No nd at the foot of the Defendant. efendant reserues the ight to supplement these issuescounsel was ineffective in Falins to call D Ambrosio concernins ailure to obtaln Co-defendant's statement who was offera Dealf and Never testified. cumulative eror Deprived the Defendant's Due Process of law and a fair

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the trial court erred in denying the motion to suppress evidence

Docket Entries

2021-11-08
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/5/2021.
2021-09-30
Waiver of right of respondent Office of the Mercer County Prosecutor to respond filed.
2021-09-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 12, 2021)

Attorneys

Office of the Mercer County Prosecutor
Laura SunyakMercer County Prosecutor Office, Respondent
Peter Klah
Peter Klah — Petitioner