Peter Klah v. Andrew J. Bruck, Acting Attorney General of New Jersey, et al.
Trial Court Erred in Denyng motion to Suppress hear case Prosecutor's comments During his opening statement nAhmeony he Co Deat Hoe Asserted his Seventyfive-year Sentence was excessive .The trial Court Erred in Permitting the state to Admit Crime scenePhoto thout laying a Proper fourdation. Counsel was ineffective When he falled to Call Witnesses Coe b Coune W effectiralser that Caut otheur narge: t Prosecua Coneiecino e vouchins for the Polie officer Arosecor Saement No othergunit rd Could have Commited the murder B Prosecutor Speculate that No nd at the foot of the Defendant. efendant reserues the ight to supplement these issuescounsel was ineffective in Falins to call D Ambrosio concernins ailure to obtaln Co-defendant's statement who was offera Dealf and Never testified. cumulative eror Deprived the Defendant's Due Process of law and a fair
Whether the trial court erred in denying the motion to suppress evidence