k)kje.-rkfiA +VUL U'5- CouA-t-o-f. Appeals, 44 a +VuL 4
C>N:ai^ cPf>Mio^ ;as u>eN at> -vW ©p<* '<M ©44U£
. ftfe-tNc-*' CcuM- -VW btetXcto4 ^av\SGS
Qj'(A GOA-^ti'C-t UMlA/V VIavS CouH- 5
holcUAcp rA nawg.a A Cu^i^gl/wM , J7<
"fpaiAceA a j 5~J3 U-3-1lU-^>/
u:s.a8£
i
yUH"
i A £ u3-todu 0"f 4rW S'fCi't'C o4 lA/ttDSCDUbc b^
lAh-u-e o4 V\\t5 p>^Ao(e ?// V

J2. (£)W aWa fkx 0p4i (a/vs O4 4-W- US • CouAf o4
/^(9p4£tb -PoA 4r-W TewA-U CcJ'curt'aiAck 4lxX US
' CbuXr 44>r -fl/iA ^CsV" ' -c acaa PI a+ lo /
:a Sa-as^a v>. UAiieAjSdiAtes^ *s&£> us.
231 CpOiJ), uilftAn upUfilcS hW beAeAal
gwH»U ot FK-WM3 ciecia.-oA kfs
^e^iAce Lsto&s bcH- " [-egaUt| cmouvmt,
-tW ^ewf^tACr/l^ Q2.WH-3 ;
J ini- o ^ +Uaf +k^ sein+Tenof 3 !
t>A4/e I'vwposc7
■41a 4-lus CowM'i ai^ # (A

Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit and the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas erred in holding that the petitioner was not in custody of the State of Missouri by virtue of his parole