Daniel Everett v. State Bar of California
1. Is constitutional due process of law violated by State Bar rules
that allow the agency to enroll licensees with disabilities on
involuntary inactive status without providing a predeprivation
evidentiary hearing on the merits, nor a postdeprivation
evidentiary hearing?
2. Is constitutional due process of law violated by State Bar rules
that allow the agency to require licensees enrolled on disability
inactive status to provide sensitive medical records as a
prerequisite to being moved to active status, even though an
evidentiary hearing on the merits is not required before placing
the licensee on disability inactive status?
Is constitutional due process of law violated by State Bar rules that allow the agency to enroll licensees with disabilities on involuntary inactive status without providing a predeprivation evidentiary hearing on the merits, nor a postdeprivation evidentiary hearing?