Michael C. Sullivan v. Karen Carrington, et al.
Takings DueProcess Privacy
WHETHER : The Fifth (5th) Amendment of the United States requires the United States government and its agencies to pay just compensation for wrong doings.
WHETHER : Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP ), can properly be applied to address a US Forest Service SF-95 civil action claim of evident facial and factual merit matters to remedy relief.
WHETHER : United States Judicial Canon Code 3 (C)(1)(e) disqualifies a federal judge, who has already stated a judicial opinion, in regards to the same subject matter controversy civil action.
WHETHER : A Judicial Canon Code 3 (C)(1)(e) disqualified federal judge can conclusory, without merits dismiss with "bad faith prejudice", a remanded de novo civil action of evident facial and factual merit matters, prior to defendants issuance service and proper answer to complaint.
WHETHER : The United States judicial system can properly address rogue government law enforcement causation organized crime racketeering violations of codes of conduct, rules, regulations and standards, that government employees vowed to protect and secure, within their code of duty and our United States of America sacred constitutional amendment rights.
Whether the Fifth Amendment requires the government to pay just compensation