No. 21-5609

Matthew Staszak v. United States, et al.

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-09-08
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: attorney-client-privilege confidential-communications constitutional-rights due-process fifth-amendment interception legal-interception sixth-amendment
Latest Conference: 2021-10-08
Question Presented (from Petition)

I. WHETHER PETITIONER'S FIFTH AND SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS WERE DEPRIVED AND VIOLATED WHEN HIS ATTORNEY-CLIENT CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATIONS WERE INTERCEPTED BY THE RESPONDENT(S).

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether petitioner's Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights were deprived and violated when his attorney-client confidential communications were intercepted by the respondent(s)

Docket Entries

2021-10-12
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
2021-09-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States, et al. to respond filed.
Main Document
2021-09-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 8, 2021)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Matthew Staszak
Matthew L. Staszak — Petitioner
United States, et al.
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent