No. 21-5608
David Angel Sifuentes v. John Prelesnik, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-jurisdiction certificate-of-appealability civil-procedure due-process federal-rules-of-civil-procedure standing
Latest Conference:
2021-10-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
Rule 6oc6) motion untimely
7o
a
of
tardy
when a litigunt opeto to
their (uoe under Rule 6ocb)C8)
reaper
an interveriny
change of habeno
vo
law within
yeur of ruling
one
of care, and io the roone aloo
eligible for a certificte of Appealability.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a district court has discretion to reopen a case under Rule 60(b) more than a year after the final judgment was entered
Docket Entries
2021-10-18
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/15/2021.
2021-09-20
Waiver of right of respondent John Prelesnik, Warden to respond filed.
2021-08-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 8, 2021)
Attorneys
David Angel Sifuentes
David Angel Sifuentes III — Petitioner
John Prelesnik, Warden
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent