1. Whether anms is proper med o cpeherhcia before the count for an unessenabte length o tine.

2. Whether to determine the pherequisites for Mandanus velieg as does plaintiff have el ear noent to velief sought: does defendant allegedly naue abused the judicial process gthe lover counts Such as they halle been boaired foon giing centais actien there.

3. whether the Flenida scypree Count uipropenly semy Mandanus dismussed rele furding that this count generally wllnot consder thevepetine petiftions of persons who helle aloused the judicial procss f the lover Counts such that they halle been berred grer filig centaiis acteis there, Conthary to the fact that the three prerequirsites for Mankamus rely as been satisfuid that estallishi that the Flonida Supreme count hos jurisdiction

I4 Whether Retitciner was Sulitle to Mandamus nelief where she has eablishia clear nifht to seheg sought That the tth gudical Circent count judge hae a Mondiseretonary Miinisteral duty to make a deciscen on her Moteons pending is the count for an ireosnabhe lenght gtine: ang that she halle exhaus all Aenus and that there is wo adeguate rebogely availalle

Whether the Flonida supneme Count accorded procedunal due process and, applied the correct Low.

W o coe a Ren of mandalus is in conplict with with the decision gthe Fyth Distaict.Fla. App.50i84.2018.

Whether Petitioners are proper Remedy to Confirm the reach of judicial review Court to make a decision on Misconduct pending for a long period