No. 21-5581

Raoul Lafond v. Richard S. Glaser, Jr., et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-09-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law due-process equal-protection standing
Latest Conference: 2021-10-29
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. The supreme court In NEITZKE, Recognized that: A complaint is Frivolous if it is, without
Arguable Merit either In Law or In Fact.. Doesnt Theories of what the plaintiff Claimed have
to be Undisputably Meritless In Order for the Court's Below to determined allegation from
plaintiffs complaint are Frivolous? :

2. Since Amendment V, the Constitution of the United States required " All Felonies be Tried
upon Indictment by a Grand Jury. " Isn't It a Violation," Under Fifth Amendment right of the
plaintiff, for Any United States Attorney, to act before the court's Using an Indictment
knowing to be falsify to prosecute the Plaintiff?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation and application of the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause

Docket Entries

2021-11-01
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/29/2021.
2021-08-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 4, 2021)

Attorneys

Raoul Lafond
Raoul Lafond — Petitioner