No. 21-5579

Emmanuel Perez v. Nebraska

Lower Court: Nebraska
Docketed: 2021-09-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circuit-court-split circuit-split criminal-procedure due-process evidence-admissibility evidence-rule evidentiary-standard federal-rules-of-evidence inextricably-intertwined judicial-interpretation standard-of-review
Latest Conference: 2021-10-29
Question Presented (from Petition)

There is a split between the United States Circuit Courts regarding whether the "inextricably intertwined " standard is a proper exception to Fed.R.Evid. 404(b), or whether a hearing should be held under Rule 404(b) regarding such evidence.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the 'inextricably intertwined' standard is a proper exception to Fed.R.Evid. 404(b)

Docket Entries

2021-11-01
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/29/2021.
2021-10-05
Waiver of right of respondent Nebraska to respond filed.
2021-08-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 4, 2021)

Attorneys

Emmanuel Perez
Darik J. Von Loh — Petitioner
Nebraska
James A. CampbellNebraska Attorney General's Office, Respondent