Did the Court of Appeals err in failing to base its Opinion on the evidentiary and adjudicated facts in the record i.e. the Trial Court's "judgment of conviction for Counts One and Two?

Did the Court of Appeals err in ruling,the Trial Court had submatter-jurisdiction over the offense pursuant to Penal Code Provision § 21.11 (a)(1)"Indecency With A Child By Sexual Contact" i.e the offense the Petitioner was charged and convicted of in Counts One and Two?

Did the Court of Appeals err in ruling the Motion to Quash and the argument in Issue Four of Petitioner's Direct Appeal Brief are not the same Issue of "Notice"?

Did the Court of Appeals err, by relying on Tex.R.App.P. 38.1(i),ruling Issues Two and Three are inadequately briefed and present nothing to review because Petitioner failed to point to any element the State was required to prove as being insufficiently supported by the evidence?

Did the Court of Appeals err in ruling, the Petitioner failed to provide Authority to support his argument and the issue is improperly briefed and presents nothing for review pursuant to Tex.R.App.P. 38.l(i)?

Did the Court of Appeals err in ruling,the Petitioner failed to presrve Petitioner's claim of prosecutorial vindictiveness by failing to comply with Tex.R.App.P. 33.1(a)?

Did the Court of Appeals err in failing to base its Opinion on the evidentiary and adjudicated facts in the record