No. 21-5573
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeals appellate-procedure constitutional-appeal constitutional-rights due-process judicial-discretion jurisdiction legal-review post-conviction standing writ-of-certiorari
Latest Conference:
2021-10-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did 'Ihe Intermediate Appellate Court Of Special Appeals Of Maryland Err When Denying Petitioner His Absolute Constitutional Right To An Appeal Or Belated Appeal?
Did The Intermediate Appellate Court Of Special Appeals Err When Denying Petitioner's Application For Leave To Appeal Without Explanation Preventing Petitioner From Appealing His Case To The-Court Of Appeals Of Maryland On Writ Of Certiorari?
Did The Post Conviction Court When Failing To ERROR On The Side Of Caution Deny Petitioner His Constitutional Right TO An Appeal Or Belated Appeal?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did The Intermediate Appellate Court Of Special Appeals Of Maryland Err When Denying Petitioner His Absolute Constitutional Right To An Appeal Or Belated Appeal?
Docket Entries
2021-11-01
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/29/2021.
2021-10-08
Waiver of right of respondent Maryland to respond filed.
2021-05-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 4, 2021)
Attorneys
Maryland
Daniel John Jawor — Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Respondent
Richard M. Miller
Richard M. Miller — Petitioner