1. DO THE DEFENDANTS HAVE ANY RIGHT TO ABUSE AN ELDERLY AND DISABLED PERSON WITHOUT THE LAW DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT?

2.. DO THE LAW PROHIBIT ABUSE OF CHILDREN under 18 ,18 WITHOUT DIONG ANYTHING ABOUT?

3. DO THE LAW ENCOURAGES US BANK TRUST AND CALIBER HOME LOAN EVICTING PATRICK CHARLES AND FAMILY FORM HIS HOME A DEBT NOT OWED FOR A DEBT NOT OWED AND THE COURTS SHOW NO JUSTICE?

4. THE DEFENDANTS IN THIS CASE VIOLATED THE FAIR DEBT COLLECTION ACT, BY WANTING PLAINTIFF TO PAY THE DEBT OF THE FORMER OWNER, RALPTH T. BROWN, WHEN THE LAW PROHIBITS?

5. WHAT ABOUT THE DAMAGES CAUSED BY CALIBER HOME LOANS AND US BANKK TRUST N.A., INFLICTING PAIN , EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, DEPRESSION , ABUSING PLAINTIF , PUTTING HIM AND FAMILY, DESTROYING HIS PROPERTY , PLAINTIFF WAS DEPRIVED OF HIS MEDICAL SERVICES IN HIS HOME, MEDICATION, CAUSING RISK TO HIS LIFE WHILE ON THE STREET,WITHOUT FOOD AND WATER, PLAINTIF IS UNDER GOING PHYCHIRATIC COUNSELING , THE REST OF THE FAMILY IS UNDERGOING COUNSELING DUE TO ABUSE, CAN THE COURTS ALLOW THE DAMAGES TO GO FREE? PLAINTIFF IS A VICTIM OF CIRCUMSTANCE.

6.6DO THE LAW PROHIBITS VIOLATION OF AND A ELDERLY AND CHILDREN AND ALLOW THE ABUSER- US BANK TRUST AND CALIBER HOME GO FREE WITH OUT PENALTY?

7. THE JUDGE IN THE DISTRICT COURT VIOLATED PLAINTIFF CONSTITUTION RIGHT-JURY TRAIL CODE38, SHE APPROVED TRAIL BY JURY AND DPRIVED THE JURY FROM RENDERING JUDGMENT IN THE CASE, DOES THE LAW PROHIBITS SUCH VIOLATION.?

.8 THE JUDGE - KAREN N. JOHNSON IN THE US DISTRICT COURT WAS IMPARTIAL IN THE CASE SHOWED PREPRENCE OR BIAS , IMPARTIALITY , TO THE DEFENDANTS, DID NOT PLAINTIFF TO SPEAK DOING THE HEARING , BUT THE DEFENDING JUDGE LAUREN N. BEREVELY, DID NOT PRESENT IN THE COURT BUT THE US DISTRICT JUDGE DID ALL THE SPEAKING ON HER BEHALF AND RENDER JUDGMENT IN THE CASE WHEN THE JURY WAS TO RENDER JUDGMENT,, IS THIS VIOLATION PRO HIBIT?

9..SOME DOCUMENTS AND MOTION FILLED WAS BEING DENIED BY HE U.S DISTRICT JUDGE NANCY K. JOHNSON , THE ONLY MOTION THE JUDGE ACCEPTED WAS MOTION FOR JURY TRAIL, WHY DID SHE ACCEPTED IT? BECAUSE PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANTS AGREED THAT JUDGMENT WAS NOT TO BE RENDERED BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE, SHE GRANTED MOTION BY JURYS BYR DEPRIVED THE JURY FROM RENDERING THE JUDGMENT IN THE CASE, IS THIS NOT IMPARTIALITY?

10 THE JUDGE NANCY K JOHNSON, DUE TO IMPARTICIALIRY, BIAS, LOST JURISDICTION IN THE CASE, DOES HER JUDGMENT STANDS?

11. IS IT RIGHT FOR THE

Do the defendants have the right to abuse an elderly and disabled person without the law doing anything about it?