Abrogated constitutional holdings/ in its application of the legal standard/ (...fundamental fairness shocking to universal justice ) in Butler V State 397 SE.2d 87/38 (1990)/ and Dissent of Justice Marshall in Sutler 103 S.Ct 242 (1982); When prior court processes were inadequate & unavailable; and this standard is used to substitute harmless error analysis nation wide.?

Whether this court should issue an order of rule "nisi"/ II28~!J5C-§ 165.1; authorizing petitioner to move the OS District court for Habeas under 28-U5C-§ 2241( c)(d) and andon issues "Arising Under" laws constitution; on issues not previously answered by the state., order addressing merits on 6/2/21.?

Whether the state court abrogated this court's constitutional holdings in its application of the legal standard of 'fundamental fairness shocking to universal justice' and whether this standard is used to substitute harmless error analysis nationwide