No. 21-5533
Marsha A. Springer v. Jeremy Howard, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability civil-rights constitutional-claim due-process habeas-corpus judicial-review reasonable-jurists sixth-circuit
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities
SocialSecurity Securities
Latest Conference:
2021-10-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
IS THE SIXTH CIRCUIT'S DENIAL OF CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY CONTRARY TO THIS COURT'S PRECEDENT? WHERE ONE JUDGE OF THE MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT DISSENTED AND INDICATED HE WOULD HAVE GRANTED LEAVE TO APPEAL CONSTITUTIONAL CLAIM. THEREFORE, HAS PETITIONER DEMONSTRATED REASONABLE JURISTS COULD DEBATE THE ISSUES PRESENTED WERE ADEQUATE TO DESERVE ENCOURAGEMENT TO PROCEED FURTHER?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is the Sixth Circuit's denial of certificate of appealability contrary to this Court's precedent?
Docket Entries
2021-10-18
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/15/2021.
2021-09-20
Waiver of right of respondent Jeremy Howard, Warden to respond filed.
2021-08-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 29, 2021)
Attorneys
Jeremy Howard, Warden
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Marsha A. Springer
Marsha A. Springer — Petitioner