WHETHER OR NOT THE NEBRASKA COURTS DECISIONS CONCERNING
"HEARSAY" CONFORMS TO THE ESTABLISHED RULE OF EVIDENCE
ON THIS SUBJECT?

WHETHER OR NOT NEBRASKA POSTCONVICTION RELIEF ACT
COMPORTS TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, UNDER
THE 5TH AND 14TH AMENDMENTS, AND THEREWITH BEARING
A CONUNDRUM THAT VIOLATES PETITIONER'S DUE PROCESS
RIGHTS GUARANTEED BY THE U.S. CONSTITUTION.

BASED UPON THE CLAIMS PRESENTED BY PETITIONER IN
HIS MOTION FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEF
ENTITLED TO RELIEF, AS PLED?WAS PETITIONER

WHETHER OR NOT THE NEBRASKA SUPREME COURT ERRED IN
ITS DECISION REGARDING THE ADJUDICATION FOR THE
PETITIONER'S ALIBI DEFENSE INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE
OF COUNSEL, MOTION IN LIMINE, SUPPRESSION OF
STATEMENTS, EXPERT WITNESS AND THE HEARDSAY CLAIMS
PROPOUNDED IN THE POSTCONVICTION MOTION AT ISSUE?

whether-the-nebraska-courts-decisions-concerning-hearsay-conform-to-the-established-rule-of-evidence