José Yeyille v. Armandina Acosta-Leon, et al.
Whether Florida Constitution Article V, Sections 3(b)(3), 3(b)(7), and 3(b)(8), Jenkins v. State, 385 So. 2d 1356 (1980), and Grate v. State, 750 So. 2d 625 (Fla. 1999) intentionally bar discretionary review for Petitions for Writs of Prohibition, MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI and any other writ to the Florida Supreme Court to indigents, and indigent PRO SE Black and Hispanic parties in violation of their Equal Protection and Due Process rights, and Access to Courts rights protected by Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and the Petition Clause of the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
Whether Florida Constitution Article V, Sections 3(b)(3), 3(b)(7), and 3(b)(8), Jenkins v. State, 385 So. 2d 1356 (1980), and Grate v. State, 750 So. 2d 625 (Fla. 1999) intentionally bar discretionary review for Petitions for Writs of Prohibition, MANDAMVS, CERTIORARE and any other writ to the Florida Supreme Court to indigents, and indigent PRO*SE Black and Hispanic parties in violation of their Equal Protection and Due Process rights, and Access to Courts rights protected by Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and the Petition Clause of the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States