No. 21-5485
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: anti-kickback conspiracy criminal-liability due-process federal-health-care government-burden-of-proof intended-victim jury-instructions medicare-fraud
Latest Conference:
2021-10-08
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. Whether jury instructions, which require that the government prove a defendant knew the crimes were against the United States and involved a federal health care program, control the validity of a conviction rather than case law holding the government is not required to allege the United States was the intended victim under the offense clause of a §371 conspiracy.
II. Whether a defendant, who merely sells beneficiary information to a provider who violates the Anti-Kickback provisions of its agreement with Medicare, can be found guilty as a co-conspirator of that provider where the defendant does not engage in any other illegal acts with that provider.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether jury instructions control the validity of a conviction rather than case law
Docket Entries
2021-10-12
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
2021-09-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-08-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 24, 2021)
Attorneys
United States
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Yamilet Diaz
Martin A. Feigenbaum — Petitioner