No. 21-548
David J. Zawistowski v. Michael D. Kramer, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: 28-usc-1331 28-usc-1332 ankenbrandt-v-richards diversity-jurisdiction domestic-relations domestic-relations-exception federal-question-jurisdiction jurisdictional-limits statutory-interpretation subject-matter-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess Jurisdiction
SocialSecurity DueProcess Jurisdiction
Latest Conference:
2022-01-07
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does the domestic relations exception apply to federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 or is the exception limited to diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the domestic relations exception apply to federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 or is the exception limited to diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332?
Docket Entries
2022-01-10
Petition DENIED. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2021-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-10-28
Waiver of right of respondent Michael D. Kramer to respond filed.
2021-10-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 12, 2021)
Attorneys
David J. Zawistowski
David J. Zawistowski — Petitioner
Michael D. Kramer
Frank Henry Bieszczat — Office of the Illinois Attorney General, Respondent