No. 21-546
Michael G. Harper, aka Cuban Mike v. United States
Relisted (2)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: criminal-justice-reform criminal-resentencing district-court district-court-discretion first-step-act intervening-legal-developments legal-developments reduced-sentence sentencing sentencing-reduction statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-06-29
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether, when deciding if it should "impose a reduced sentence" on an individual under Section 404(b) of the First Step Act of 2018, a district court must or may consider intervening legal developments.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether, when deciding if it should 'impose a reduced sentence' on an individual under Section 404(b) of the First Step Act of 2018, a district court must or may consider intervening legal developments
Docket Entries
2022-08-01
JUDGMENT ISSUED
2022-06-30
Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of <i>Concepcion</i> v. <i>United States</i>, 597 U. S. ___ (2022).
2022-06-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/29/2022.
2021-12-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/14/2022.
2021-12-13
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2021-11-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 13, 2021.
2021-11-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 12, 2021 to December 13, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-10-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 12, 2021)
Attorneys
Michael Harper
Catherine Emily Stetson — Hogan Lovells US LLP, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent