No. 21-5454
IFP
Tags: actual-innocence aedpa appellate-review civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process habeas-corpus innocence-claim judicial-discretion procedural-technicality statute-of-limitations
Latest Conference:
2021-10-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Do the court of Appeals abuse its discretion by refusing to recall mandate for miscarriage of justice, not acknowledging the guiding general principles underlying the Supreme Court's habeas corpus jurisprudence for actual innocence?
Docket Entries
2021-11-01
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/29/2021.
2021-04-19
Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 23, 2021)
Attorneys
Samuel Lee Quinn
Samuel Quinn — Petitioner