No. 21-5445

Henryk S. Borecki v. Department of Homeland Security, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-08-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 1983 1985 1986 airline-passenger civil-rights civil-rights-act constitutional-rights due-process self-incrimination standing travel-identification
Latest Conference: 2021-10-29
Question Presented (from Petition)

Does the plaintiffs complaint, based on Sections 1983, 1985 and 1986 of the Civil Rights Acts, state a claim for relief against both or either of the defendants?

Can a joint federal-state program for travel identification of airline passengers completely disembowel and eviscerate the requirements of Goldberg v. Kelly?

Does the Constitution require that a citizen incriminate himself by falsely, fictitiously and fraudulently presenting written materials to get a REAL Travel Identification Card?

Can the State of Arizona require a citizen to commit a federal crime prior to boarding an aircraft, just to get a safe flight as a passenger?

Whether the plaintiff presented sufficient documentary evidence to permit him to enjoy his constitutional right and his constitutional privilege to fly within the United States to see his family in Omaha, Nebraska.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the plaintiff's complaint, based on Sections 1983, 1985 and 1986 of the Civil Rights Acts, state a claim for relief against both or either of the defendants?

Docket Entries

2021-11-01
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/29/2021.
2021-09-22
Waiver of right of respondent Department of Homeland Security to respond filed.
2021-07-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 22, 2021)

Attorneys

Department of Homeland Security
Brian H. FletcherActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Henryk S. Borecki
Henryk S. Borecki — Petitioner