1. If beneficiaries of the United States Constitution have the right to
prosecute in their own name under Article 3, Section 2 of the Constitution
protected by 42 USC § 1981 and in accordance with the 7th, 9th, and 10th
Amendments and evenly applied through the 14th Amendment, then any
judges/justices who are clearly ignoring or encroaching upon these rights
according to the supreme laws of the land are committing treason for any
blockage, suppression, undo-influence, or coercion not fulfilling their oath
of office?
All judges/justices in petitioner's case have violated 18 USC Ch. 115:
TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES, § 2383. Rebellion or
insurrection - "Whoever incites,
rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the
laws thereof (emphasis added), or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be
incapable of holding any office under the United States."sets on foot, assists, or engages in a

2. if Americans have the right!
behalf under the constitute
for fraud, then would a dis
violate pro se litigant's cto access their courts to prosecute on their own
on and law already established by 42 USC § 1981
missal without discovery or jury deliberation
onstitutional guarantees?

3. If petitioner is a benefici
constitution being a bindin
court for a case that is fr
between the court and the p
venue to conduct a trial by
provide a venue as a matterary of the United States Constitution and the
g legal contract, then paying $400 to the district
ee with no cost, is a contract with considerations
ro se litigant? If the pro se litigant paid for a
jury and verdict then the court has a duty to
of right and contractual obligation?

4. Are justices violating 18 U
prior to jury verdict when
clearly written in plain EnSC CH.115 in its entirety when dismissing a case
the laws and rights of the pro se litigant are'
glish, unambiguous, or capricious?

5. If the Fourteenth Amendment
sue protected by 42 USC § 1
be a neutral arbitrator of
a jury to render a verdictprovides equal protection at law and the right to
then a dismissal by a district court judge to
facts, oversee discovery and testimony, and allow
violates petitioner's rights when her pre-paid
case is dismissed without completion of a jury trial?981,

If beneficiaries of the United States Constitution have the right to prosecute in their own name under Article 3, Section 2 of the Constitution protected by 42 USC § 1981 and in accordance with the 7%, 9%, and 10% Amendments and evenly applied through the 14 Amendment, then any judges/justices who are clearly ignoring or encroaching upon these rights according to the supreme laws of the land are committing treason for any blockage, suppression, undo-influence, or coercion not fulfilling their oath of office?