Whether the district court and court of appeals have effectively abrogated this Court's binding precedent for reviewing a motion for summary judgment—whether the evidence, considered in a light most favorable to the non-movant and with all justifiable inferences drawn in his favor, creates a genuine issue of material fact—by applying numerous tests and standards that obfuscate Petitioner's ultimate burden and deprive him of the opportunity to make his case?

Whether the district court and court of appeals have effectively abrogated this Court's binding precedent for reviewing a motion for summary judgment