Ho\ij Comc . +hc. 5uPre.m£Cour-t oP oh»D in CA3e Klo. 3iO£±- og SLB refUsee i
to accept JunadxtAion <x PPc.ll nnt3 MEA/iornndu aa'1 bk]o\jUin& 4hc.
fACt-Yhftt Vine APPeUatc Couftt erred an OCT . £& d?od?C> £ £>. C"3jJflurnftfi
Entry dentine A fYlD + f to Set n Suit AnflGi 3trf?4e9 orderj from -the
L D*4 ocT< 7j & O3.0 /7)PGt'i37rA7e3 order* \dhcs) Ck, P Pcriian't StnmfkJ
P \ei in Ten dflV3 DCT, <3X 30310 C F-oho+iod For /ertve For APPFcoFiodon
-Pof Piecondide-rcL-Vi PurBAuni- -Vo chio APR R, M&iCai (b)CcX has
bee.n Pi \cA A3 -Hie A/\A-Vhcna<v4'iCc,] )y Correct in TendfiYS -For APPtUfde.
Court do Veoonsiclor Arheir IWl6e.me*rt op
Order* Moi p moiion do 6cl nsidt rnttbldirafea order?\ o n
OCT- J*£0£o /T)A?G^rfr/9ieS

APn LJJbj Ao<23.CAPP' x, A -JLjudeieonefvt of •V'oc, SuPteone Cout6T e>P ovtio erred
by re.Vusin6 to a.C.Cc-PtJoir\sdic.4ion 0$ PH emor n-ndu m, .Kbiouii 4hnt /IP Pel late.
Court Crred on 0CT.£%«30ot£> LAPPX.fh-£ Jour aa L £ rv try), d en Y/a/£» /) /WOT i'oa/ 4c*
SeA A Side-ftAA&istrAtea ocd&r, from the (APPx.C$ Oct. 7, 3030 m/)&iz>lr#4e3
orde^. Uihen APPellnnt Vi lyield Stamped in Ten dn13 { APPx-134 dc7,<£3.*£03D
KAot-\On for h.PP\*\CAtlon Cov* fte-eon £ 1 der a~bi'a */ PurSAunT 7a oh\'oAPP- /?. Qu>
(A} £1) £ab£b)tcj hAO been filed A3 -VVie

Whether the Supreme Court of Ohio erred in refusing to accept jurisdiction of appellants' memorandum, despite the fact that the appellate court erred on October 7, 2020 in denying a motion to set aside a magistrate's order