No. 21-5417

Alfred E. Caraffa v. Tempe Police Department, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-08-20
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights due-process official-capacity pleading-standards qualified-immunity standing
Latest Conference: 2021-10-15
Question Presented (from Petition)

I Address the Arizona District court's Refusal to trial iN CCSC No.2:I9-CV-O5492-PHx-MTL-ESW) when IrAppendix B pg-2of8 pt. It states Plainti f has claims. devials to file this case to the Arizone civilcouts

3) Address the unlanfal confine rent(3) deys in Oct. 2019 iN this Jail. C.B.C.JON Ta3A-POd CEl1 8

4) Address the constitutional violatioN(s) of this Civilaction.

5) Address the Refusal to file this case Now three times to civil courts.

6) Address HhE District Courts (Arizona) Refusal of i trial Sec Appendix A Seventh Amendment sights to A civil pages 2and2)

) Adess thuscoflegal ter"Nonjuralentity"usn this case to dismissal of Defendant s under official Capacity filed in/on oct.2u2019.

8) Address the misleading Statement "CanNot Succeed as a Present defenses"to Dismiss An Defendant in civil action. Providing A defense is for the Defendantes) Not the Judqe.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the district court erred in dismissing the plaintiff's civil rights claims against the defendants

Docket Entries

2021-10-18
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/15/2021.
2021-08-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 20, 2021)

Attorneys

Alfred E. Caraffa
Alfred E. Caraffa — Petitioner