No. 21-5409
Antonyo Reece v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure district-court judicial-discretion pepper-precedent pepper-v-united-states rehabilitation-evidence sentencing sentencing-variance upward-departure
Latest Conference:
2021-10-08
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether imposing an upward departure of 200 months to a criminal defendant who has exemplary rehabilitation evidence is incongruous to this Court's holding in Pepper v. United States, 52 U.S. 4 76, 131 S. Ct. 1229, 179 L. Ed. 2d 196 (2011).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether imposing an upward departure of 200 months to a criminal defendant who has exemplary rehabilitation evidence is incongruous to this Court's holding in Pepper v. United States
Docket Entries
2021-10-12
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
2021-09-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2021-08-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 17, 2021)
Attorneys
Antonyo Reece
James Patrick Whalen — Whalen Law Office, Petitioner
United States of America
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent