1. In the interest of justice, should a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 be entertained under less stringent conditions if it contains both "actial innocence " and ineffective assistance of council " claims?

2. Why does the severity of a crime make it imposible to prove ones innocence?

3. Why is Meta Data not considered substantial evidence when innocence based on the Meta Data due to the pattern it portrays?

4. Is a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 time barred when it was deposited in prison mail box within the one year time limit, but reseaved after the time limit due to the Mail Room's delay in requesting additional postage?

Should a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 be entertained under less stringent conditions if it contains both 'actual-innocence' and 'ineffective-assistance-of-counsel' claims?