I. Should this Court grant certiorari, vacate the Circuit's ruling, and remand for further consideration in light of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), for Mr. Boyd's counsel's fail to jet to disibl evidenc Te search Warrant and Supporting Affidavit)?

II. Should this Court grant certiorari vacate the Circuit's ruling, and remand for further Consideration in light of Napue v. Illinois, 360 U.S. 264, 269 (1959), which announced that conviction obtained through the use of False evidence known to be such by representatives of the State must fall under the Fourteenth Amendment?

Whether the court should grant certiorari, vacate the circuit's ruling, and demand further consideration in light of Strickland v. Washington and Napue v. Illinois