1. Whether the district court lacked jurisdiction to enter judgement under 18 U.S.C § 1956(h), where Petitioner was not charged with nor engaged in "financial transaction in criminal profit ' of $2.1 million, and whether judgment contravene clearly established Supreme Court law and the Due Process clause of the 5th and 14th Amendment.

2. Whether the waiver in the Plea Agreement bars Petitioner from challenging the Court 's Jurisdiction to convict and sentence him for violation of 18 U.S.C. 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (h) where the State is precluded by Federal law and the United States Constitution from hailing Petitioner into court on this charge.

3. Whether the waiver in the Plea Agreement bars Petitioner 's Challenge to a VOID Judgment where the court exceeded its statutory authority and on a charge the State cannot constitutionally prosecute.

Whether the district court lacked jurisdiction to enter judgement under 18 U.S.C § 1956(h)