No. 21-5376
Samuel Roy Abram v. David Leu, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-procedure civil-rights due-process exhaustion-of-remedies prison-litigation-reform-act standing
Latest Conference:
2021-10-08
Question Presented (from Petition)
d.) Vks ^vm^ viAkiA urvtedW. ?LM"Vo
Ttau^sV ejcxvsvkrrittfn ofar\ onkmAvi (Ar'kja'rxca.. Tax' Cl \1aM
t£AdDc\ di$i\ d ^^Pl'a'sT^ITemj T
» \ 1OdS ^OTUon-iC Oamm \
a&mit\^ftfldk, towlids ~M3t ^sl^xj CxTCjiV tioo\d
(\\)es\\<w\<iJ!%L d\lai\s5 '
3) tMoiaD Mfthta oF$tfL<JfcMift• fetrf#(L Vbmwiii5 -fikd uj tH\v a dVie_rV\jao \/<Mrs ofiWL.
(k^iPvnclAiffV?\
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was petitioner required to request consideration of an unwritten grievance, for a valid reason under PLRA?
Docket Entries
2021-10-12
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
2021-09-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-08-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 15, 2021)
Attorneys
Samuel Roy Abram
Samuel Roy Abram — Petitioner
United States
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent