I.
WHETHER OR NOT THE NEBRASKA COURTS RELIANCE ON A WITNESS
STATEMENTS (Sean Nowling) INDUCED THE STATE'S (Respondent)
CASE-IN-CHIEF VIA ERRONEOUS OR PREJUDICIAL HEARSAY EVIDENCE
WHICH CAUSED THE TRIAL BY JUDGE TO FINDING!OF GUILT VERDICT
AGAINST PETITIONER, CONTRARY TO THE STATE AND FEDERAL
CONSTITUTIONS, COMPORTING TO THE FIFTH, EIGHTH, AND
FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS, AND NEBRASKA CONSTITUTION, UNDER
ARTICLE I, §§ 3,9,11, AND 12, RESPECTIVELY.

II.
WHETHER OR NOT THE NEBRASKA COURTS FINDINGS AND AFFIRMATIONS
COMPORTED TO SUBSTANTIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, IN THIS CRIMINAL
MATTER.

III.
WHETHER OR NOT PETITIONER'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS UNDER THE
STATE AND FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONS, CONCERNING THE "DOUBLE
JEOPARDY" CLAUSE, WAS VIOLATED IN THIS CRIMINAL MATTER.

IV.
WHETHER OR NOT THE DICTUM ISSUED BY THE NEBRASKA APPELLATE
COURTS @ State v. Sollman, 29 Neb.App.356 (2021) (A-20-172),
AND THE NEBRASKA SARPY COUNTY DISTRICT COURT, @ CR19-244,
ILLUMINATED SUFFICIENT AND 'SUBSTANTIVE REASONINGS 'INVOLVING,
PROXIMATE CAUSE, INTERVENING CAUSE, CAUSAL LINK,*NEGLIGENCE,
TRIAL EVIDENCE, MIRANDA RIGHTS, CONFESSIONS, DRUNK DRIVING,
AND DIRECTED VERDICT.

V.
WHETHER OR NOT THIS INSTANT CAUSE FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI ~
SUFFICE VIA PETITIONER'S NOW::CHALLENGED ATTACK HEREIN TO THE
CONSTITUTIONALITY OF NEBRASKA STATUTE(S).

whether-the-nebraska-courts-reliance-on-witness-statements-induced-erroneous-or-prejudicial-hearsay-evidence