Whether, in light of Minnesota v. Olson, 495 U.S. 91, 96-97 (1990), the lower courts erred in holding that Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573 (1980) controlled the lawfulness of the warrantless search of the third party residence for Petitioner-Arrestee instead of Steagald v. United States, 451 U.S. 204 (1981)?

Where multiple additional errors affected petitioner's conviction and/or sentence in the courts below, should this Court exercise it's supervisory power to vacate his conviction and sentence?

Whether Steagald v. United States protects an arrestee in a third party's residence