No. 21-5343
Jimmie Washington, aka Jim Washington v. United States District Court for the District of South Carolina
IFP
Tags: appellate-procedure cheney-standard cheney-test civil-procedure immediate-relief injunction injunctive-relief judicial-review mandamus mandamus-petition stay writ-of-certiorari
Latest Conference:
2021-10-08
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether a court of appeals failure to grant a first and second amended petition for writ of mandamus conflicts with this court and other court of appeals precedents when it based on a standard less than the Cheney mandated_three prong inquiry test.
2. Whether certiorari is an appropriate remedy to seek immediate relief to enjoin the orders of a court of appeals that have the practical effect of denying request for stay and injunctive relief.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a court of appeals failure to grant a first and second amended petition for writ of mandamus conflicts with this court and other court of appeals precedents
Docket Entries
2021-10-12
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
2021-08-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 10, 2021)
Attorneys
Jim Washington
Jim Washington — Petitioner