No. 21-5302
Roosevelt Rico Dahda v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: alleyne-v-united-states criminal-sentencing drug-quantity jury-determination mandatory-minimum mandatory-minimum-sentence sixth-amendment statutory-maximum statutory-maximum-sentence
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether a finding on the issue of drug quantity that increases the statutory maximum sentence requires the jury to make an individualized determination of the amount of drugs attributable to a defendant because under such circumstances, drug quantity constitutes an "element" of the offense for purposes of the Sixth Amendment.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a finding on the issue of drug quantity that increases the statutory maximum sentence requires the jury to make an individualized determination of the amount of drugs attributable to a defendant
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2021-08-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-07-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 7, 2021)
Attorneys
Roosevelt Dahda
Robert T. Fishman — Ridley, McGreevy & Winocur, PC, Petitioner
United States
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent