v\"~Ue lO1^ kr^urV- err m -^zhUa^ 1t> ko[J! k's L-Cf.
/Wtqren s-f^k/tory dSuiy oo^r
vKC ^ 144- 4© fc-fer ANy Af£i^a/i4of j^nejo^oe, 1x>
jsncrt-Wr C+. 3Wge 4r> iekerrum^ £iV*+ ^ b-£h
Memo's re-G^al4^ c^^ty uJiH, kn Sfak/tocy
(wVi^ of J£v>e process 4 eouzci ftruHecicon 1
erf'fti£ I'an/U on star 14^ A^ncf^/Tt' "c
\ ^ 'VU^e ID^ 1 fireo i4 err in -{^A tAq fo Peco^A(^6/\Ay;
iWx#\ernt of senoor pkySc<:af injury "SVfvS iJming
}\UeiAJi£e rei/£<r£e TKe c^Atztf of sn
vnAer aBoSC%l4lH$) tn ^ b-Ck cA#^-^' 3((^'tm
j!) VU2 10^ Ct>, £ b,£f- *rr in ^ai(iA<fit> Trppt Counsel
On iMxf feetal 'f(Vi\e(teioi/ deA</if\q ami tuZ'zfitnq&f Coor^~
Kcte45 On^tar st^u2 l^AA^A^^/vf Y^€ Orw^uai*?
S€v/^eCu Oneros 4 fo> tatfafoty £or%* impose (ch W
b.Cv. kr 5n^ply c¥o<A<f ffa? rV)Gz$ Or (aw feqe/trerf *u£
4o AO/i-e^ £?ck a oUanqe 0f v/Htere a faoA2r6<d£g
CowtcH- of uHen^f required He? acf u/v&>r 3-2? os: %4sr ^4144-*
4))3^4rW^c$^id-Coor4'$ 2^4(00 iafen ^ feoc^o
OfrT&fchb/)^ ToQqntQ l^SV^ (MoU n°^5 preeff6| (/v? .beMonsfe ,+o/f <§AA ^6fc3l;^4e Im/* fevers# M2&\/e ffi*1iW
USW T"

Did the 10th Circuit err in failing to hold its D.C.T. Judge Mclaren had a statutory duty under 28 USC § 144 to refer my affidavit of prejudice to another D.C.T. Judge to determine if that D.C.T. Judge Mclaren's refusal to comply with his statutory duties deprived me of due process & equal protection under the 14th Amendment