No. 21-5289
Gregory Moore, Individually, and on Behalf of J. M., et al. v. County of Orange, California, et al.
IFP
Tags: child-seizure civil-rights due-process federal-funds fourth-amendment fraud res-judicata rooker-feldman standing warrant-requirement
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess FourthAmendment Privacy
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess FourthAmendment Privacy
Latest Conference:
2021-10-08
Question Presented (from Petition)
A) In federal districts that recognize the Rooker-Feldman fraud exception to res judicata: Shall Rooker-Feldman be arbitrarily applied?
B) Shall the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) rule to bring Rooker-Feldman uniformity across all the federal districts?
Outside of exigent circumstances can a government social worker seize a child from their family using federal taxpayers' funds without a United States Constitution (USC) 4th amendment (4A) required warrant?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Rooker-Feldman should be uniformly applied across federal districts
Docket Entries
2021-10-12
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
2021-07-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 3, 2021)
Attorneys
Gregory Moore, et al.
Gregory Moore — Petitioner