No. 21-5270
Robert Stanard v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights commerce-clause constitutional-review criminal-procedure due-process firearms judicial-interpretation legal-challenge personal-property state-law takings
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Does the taxing powers oF Congress negahes Operson's Possessory
Vakeresd in Suineralip of A Ciena,
A. Where doos Ivhersioke Commern bean ond end Ww Cegudartod
Sf Tiemarmspader Te VS USG. Seckion FALLS ,
3, Wor does unloweul Possession of Firuacmn" Substantially EER AY
\ahkerstake Comnmerte
4, Con Conguss® Coram Lox o Firercty Sinad Ve no Voige Passing
RCQuQn UVSEr Sho TOPAEMerey .
S.A Uhl Bink Jn Vaderatobe Commerce does Q FiRACH
eens PACSONAL PCOPAVY wining NIND TREAKING oF Foust
Kenard wank Se Ucoted Stokes Conadthudion.
b. Does Commercesand ak the Point of Retail Sale of Lhe,
Trcearm.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the taxing powers of Congress negate a person's possessory interest in personal property?
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-07-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 2, 2021)
Attorneys
Robert Stanard
Robert Stanard — Petitioner
United States
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent