1) Has the Supreme Court of the United States Abandoned its own precedent in Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425, 6 S.Ct. 1121, 30 L.Ed. 178 (1886), where this court formulated the void ab initio doctrine?

2) If the first question is in the negative, then, whether in light of Norton; ex parte Siebold, 100 U.S. 371 (1879); and Montgomery v. Louisiana, 136 S.Ct. 718 (2016), can a claim of illegal conviction based on alleged facially unconstitutional (void) statute, if well taken, overcome Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act's (AEDPA) one-year statute of limitations pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1) for filing habeas corpus petitions?

3) Did the Seventh Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals err by denying Petitioner a Certificate of Appealability (COA) from the denial of his Rule 60(b) Motion, contrary to Buck v. Davis, 137 S.Ct. 759 (2017); and Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473 (2000)?

Whether the Supreme Court has abandoned its precedent in Norton v. Shelby County regarding the void ab initio doctrine