James E. Nottingham v. Laurel Harry, et al.
1. Shall the Writ of Certiorari be Granted in favor of the Petitioner James E. Nottingham for false arrest?
2. Shall the Writ of Certiorari be Granted in favor of the Petitioner for the acts of Perjury and fraud by the Respondents?
3. Is the warrant of arrest and the Search warrant void for not being ascertained by law in magisterial district number 2V3-03, the honorable Jon U KEM?
4. Shall the complaint be ruled under the original file challenging the convictions and sentences?
5. Is it mandatory and Jurisdictional for the arresting officer the Preliminary hearing and trials to appear at as Counsel in the State Proceedings constitutionally effective?
6. Is there an alternate remedy of APPEARANCE or Wholly frivolous fabricated court document?
7. Was the Case(s) being Presented Full and fair?
8. Should this case be investigated?
9. Does the State have Jurisdiction over this case?
Whether the writ of certiorari should be granted in favor of the Petitioner James E. Nottingham for false arrest, perjury, fraud, void warrant, ineffective counsel, and lack of jurisdiction