No. 21-5260

James E. Nottingham v. Laurel Harry, et al.

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2021-07-30
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process false-arrest habeas-corpus jurisdiction jurisdictional-challenge perjury standing writ-of-certiorari
Latest Conference: 2021-10-08
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Shall the Writ of Certiorari be Granted in favor of the Petitioner James E. Nottingham for false arrest?

2. Shall the Writ of Certiorari be Granted in favor of the Petitioner for the acts of Perjury and fraud by the Respondents?

3. Is the warrant of arrest and the Search warrant void for not being ascertained by law in magisterial district number 2V3-03, the honorable Jon U KEM?

4. Shall the complaint be ruled under the original file challenging the convictions and sentences?

5. Is it mandatory and Jurisdictional for the arresting officer the Preliminary hearing and trials to appear at as Counsel in the State Proceedings constitutionally effective?

6. Is there an alternate remedy of APPEARANCE or Wholly frivolous fabricated court document?

7. Was the Case(s) being Presented Full and fair?

8. Should this case be investigated?

9. Does the State have Jurisdiction over this case?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the writ of certiorari should be granted in favor of the Petitioner James E. Nottingham for false arrest, perjury, fraud, void warrant, ineffective counsel, and lack of jurisdiction

Docket Entries

2021-10-12
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
2021-07-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 30, 2021)

Attorneys

James E. Nottingham
James E. Nottingham — Petitioner