No. 21-526
Uber Technologies, Inc. v. Damaris Rosales
Tags: california-labor-code contract-law epic-systems federal-arbitration-act individual-arbitration ninth-circuit paga-claims preemption
Latest Conference:
2022-06-23
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether agreements calling for individual arbitration are enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act with respect to claims asserted under the California Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether agreements calling for individual arbitration are enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act with respect to claims asserted under the California Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act
Docket Entries
2022-07-29
JUDGMENT ISSUED
2022-06-27
Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana, 596 U. S. ___ (2022).
2022-06-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/23/2022.
2022-01-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-01-12
Letter dated January 12, 2022 from counsel for petitioner filed.
2022-01-10
Letter dated January 10, 2022 from counsel for respondent filed.
2021-11-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 10, 2022.
2021-11-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 10, 2021 to January 10, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-11-10
Response Requested. (Due December 10, 2021)
2021-11-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.
2021-10-29
Waiver of right of respondent Damaris Rosales to respond filed.
2021-10-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 8, 2021)
Attorneys
Damaris Rosales
Deepak Gupta — Gupta Wessler PLLC, Respondent
Michael Alexander Gold — GOLD APLC, Respondent
Uber Technologies, Inc.
Theane Evangelis Kapur — Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Petitioner