The Supfeme Court Was recognized three Ato Young relief Younger u. Harris ,H01 U,S, 37 ( M7I). _
,W.»* of Ui fnltb orK-»rA™« e«tLyrt,teofhcwl S r«pwiUe ^
We applied in +We criminal proceeding isWstentica tin at allow er a
pretrial WaWeaS corpus
- °wWere(l) there is a
fot +\,e r„sec«t»«-, (*) '
f Uy»r*ntly violate *f «fte« co»rtitwtl«wl pr.v! r!o(ls , or (3)aw to
dia+fi and irreparable circummftces exist tW frevent a threat of '**«extraordinaryy* . , w t^ury.

Question Xf
Xs it state Karnssment and is there potential for state harassment when a
pretrial detainee cannot seek relief for insufficient grand jury minutes tecguse his
trial is suspended WecavSC We is ruled incapable to pMSi SI proceed?

Question 3L,
Xs it stateUr, SW.t(l), patently violative (s« 2.) , «J /- Irr.y.r.Ue (3)
poteoftaUyfAKIO objectively unreasonable force as per Kinyley v. Hendrickson)
dication as part of a pretrial Jetainmect condition
ll% Wrain weight decrease permanently?War aa
to force dopamine iaWihitor
%uWen such drugs haveme
keen shown to cause

Question 33L .
Xs it state
potentially (AND vioUtWe
to force dopamine
when swcVi drugstlyv'.vUiivclseeZ^ J/«r irreparable (3) barm
f property and/or liberty^harassment (x) > f C ft
of the l1th AmmentUent for lOSS o
d Hi 'inhibitor medication «$ part of a predial detainment
ijWt dccreqse permanently"?on cc!)
Wave Ween shown to cavse braid wet

Is it state harassment and is there potential for state harassment when a pretrial detainee cannot seek relief for insufficient grand jury minutes because his trial is suspended because he is ruled incapable to proceed?