Whether, my civil liberty rights; racial Justice; require private
citizens to have probable cause and search warrants to obtain geolocation data,
lacking these amounts to violating constitutional rights of equal protection, due
process of the law, In the protection from virtual trespassing and virtual invasion of
privacy.1.

Whether when, the head Judge enters a Journal Entry on the hearing
of plaintiffs Affidavit of prejudice for removal of trial judge, long after the trial
judge entered the journal entry on the verdict, and the plaintiff has an active Notice
of Appeal filed Amount to a denial of equal access to Justice and protection of the
Laws for the Kansas Court of Appeals to ignore that 2nd journal entry denying
plaintiff the right to appeal that 2nd journal entry, which produced an unfair trial.2.

Whether when the defendant having been given judgment on all
issues, except their liability as to an unnamed 3rd party, are allowed to present
their whole case to the jury, while by direct court order plaintiff could not address
their complicity but only a very narrow showing of what their 3rd party
coconspirator did, amount to a denial of a fair trial, as protected by Law and did
defendants forfeit their summary judgment decision.3.

Whether when 3 young people track, stalk, causing injury and
damages, by Means of modern I Phone technology, to an elderly Mexican American,
amount to the denial of equal protection of the laws, when they are not prosecuted
for the loss/planting and use of a tracking device without a Court Order.4.

Whether private citizens require probable cause and search warrants to obtain geolocation data, lacking these amounts to violating constitutional rights