No. 21-5204

Walter Patrick v. Jimmy Thomas, Warden

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2021-07-27
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights due-process equal-protection incarceration standing statute-of-limitations
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Question Presented (from Petition)

"Did fcke Ek^&dh ^IrcLuV
PWtkn&A VW4- ^Py'V i ik ii\i/vk/£/dV [ iA a e>Pik-
uiPd ^Wciat,K u^Klok a. ^ekk'oAer fVWH
A&£ke. PVY4 ?ror<£AurAl AdAUH-
Or eXPirm Jbb&ukt ar UmiWioc\£>. Aik
Qyi G.&ittX \i. far'-kifuLg /^(d0! diS.-A&3,3£Piv
\52>5,C+. l4lM /^20 £20120.
Vote Ite L\£\}faX)\ ClRCniT COUfrT UoLb
southejfist in\cm\c.£hme .d ii'iTfiPrfes to
^ TltftT TM£PilDL3 ll\<LAftCERW£&
(HIIT-E aK Tb LVtkAfc1E.;BV Hold I fi 6 PftBO/vltRfi To P\ ^-rmtiMvo tWat GTw&d Pkoi^kW-
PlS )f\L -m& LJOxJ P(\OF££>6IO/\1.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Eleventh Circuit err in holding that a petitioner cannot challenge an expired statute of limitations?

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-29
Waiver of right of respondent Jimmy Thomas, Warden to respond filed.
2021-01-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 26, 2021)

Attorneys

Jimmy Thomas, Warden
Beth Slate PoeAL Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Walter Patrick
Walter Patrick — Petitioner