1. When a judge openly admits bias against an appellant in which he was not only the trial judge but also the sentencing, shouldn't the remedy afforded to the appellant be a new trial in front of a fair and impartial judge. That the appellants right to the due process of law may not be violated?

2. When an appellant's conviction was against the manifest weight of the evidence and was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt, shouldn't the conviction be overturned?

3. If an appellant proved to his sentencing court that the Presentencing Investigation provided before sentencing was incorrect and the appellant's past criminal history was nearly non-existent, shouldn't the courts sentencing be proportionate when considering consecutive sentences?

Appellant's right to due process of law