No. 21-519
Growth Energy v. American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, et al.
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: administrative-law clean-air-act environmental-regulation epa-interpretation ethanol-blending ethanol-waiver fuel-blends reid-vapor-pressure statutory-construction statutory-interpretation volatility-limit
Key Terms:
Environmental AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity
Environmental AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity
Latest Conference:
2022-01-07
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the United States Environmental Protection Agency may interpret the ethanol-waiver provision in 42 U.S.C. § 7545(h)(4) to apply to fuel blends whose concentration of ethanol exceeds 10 percent.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the United States Environmental Protection Agency may interpret the ethanol-waiver provision in 42 U.S.C. § 7545(h)(4) to apply to fuel blends whose concentration of ethanol exceeds 10 percent
Docket Entries
2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-21
Reply of petitioner Growth Energy filed. (Distributed)
2021-12-08
Brief of respondent United States Environmental Protection Agency in opposition filed.
2021-11-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 8, 2021.
2021-11-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 8, 2021 to December 8, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-11-03
Waiver of right of respondents American Petroleum Institute; American Motorcyclist Association; Citizens Concerned About E15; Coalition of Fuel Marketers; National Marine Manufacturers Association to respond filed.
2021-10-28
Waiver of right of respondents American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers to respond filed.
2021-10-25
Brief of respondents Urban Air Initiative, Inc., et al. in support filed.
2021-10-07
Waiver of right of respondents Renewable Fuels Association; National Corn Growers Association to respond filed.
2021-10-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 8, 2021)
Attorneys
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers
Elizabeth Boucher Dawson — Crowell & Moring LLP, Respondent
American Petroleum Institute; American Motorcyclist Association; Citizens Concerned About E15; Coalition of Fuel Marketers; National Marine Manufacturers Association
Kevin Franz King — Covington & Burling LLP, Respondent
Growth Energy
Seth P. Waxman — Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Petitioner
Renewable Fuels Association; National Corn Growers Association
Matthew Winkle Morrison — Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, Respondent
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Urban Air Initiative, Inc.; The Farmer's Educational & Cooperative Union of America; Farmers Union Enterprises, Inc.; Big River Reasources, LLC; Glacial Lakes Energy, LLC; Clean Fuels Development Coalition; Fagen, Inc.; Jackson Express, Inc.; Jump Start S
C. Boyden Gray — Boyden Gray and Associates PLLC, Respondent