1. Did granting a Summary Judgment violate my Seventh Amendment rights to a trial by jury as this was my request and my constitutional right as a US Citizen who filed a suit of Common Law, with a value exceeding twenty dollars?

2. If Summary Judgments aren't unconstitutional, why has the Seventh Amendment never been ratified to eliminate this constitutional right of US Citizens?

3. Should Summary Judgments be a way for an attorney to win over a Pro Se due to a fundamental misunderstanding of the rules of Civil Procedure? In my case, both lower courts stated I didn't completely follow the Rules of Civil Procedures and due to this misunderstanding of how to put a Summary Judgment response together, the lower courts used the defendants' evidence and testimony and disregarded mine.

4. Once a Summary Judgment is granted, should that automatically eliminate all evidence of the case not entered into the Summary Judgment?

5. Should a Pro Se always lose in a Summary Judgment against an attorney due to technical errors that eliminates the Pro Se's evidence and factual arguments of their case?

6. Is a genuine issue of material fact, a fact that if in favor of a plaintiff or defendant can cause a jury to rule in their favor, be a fact that should defeat a motion for summary judgment?

7. Should one genuine issue of material fact such as failing to grant me proper Procedural Due Process, be enough reasoning for the District Court to deny a motion for summary judgment and allow a case to go to a trial by jury?

8. Should the United States District Court Judge have granted a motion for summary judgment after a court date for trial had already been set?

9. If an attorney who has been given all of the evidence through disclosure and discovery doesn't think they can win a lawsuit in a trial by jury, should a Summary Judgment allow them to terminate a case before a trial by jury?

10. Can a Procedural Due Process violation should be enough to defeat a motion for summary judgment and allow a case to proceed to trial?

11. When a plaintiff proves a defendants Affidavit has lies within the text and the plaintiff has proved those lies to be untrue, should the lower court allow the defendants to retract their statement in a sworn Affidavit and still review other facts within the same Affidavit as factual?

12. 24 CFR §982.554(b)(1) states that an informal hearing can't be conducted by any persons other than the one who made or approved the decision under review. Can the Executive Director that approved the termination of my assistance, qualify as a proper informal hearing officer by Law which is a direct statute violation?

13. If 24 CFR §982.554(b)(1) is violated and proven to be violated through evidence, should the lower court have allowed this informal hearing to be approved in terminating a participants housing voucher? Would this also violate a participants Procedural Due Process?

14. If a Housing Authority adopts laws through the United States Housing of Urban Development (HUD) called their Administrative Plan as required, and the Housing Authority fails to follow procedural steps that were crucial to completing an investigation, would this violate a participants Procedural Due Process?

15. How many Procedural Due Process violations should a lower court allow before denying a motion for summary judgment?

16. Can the lower Courts allow a Housing Authority to terminate a disabled participants' voucher for Fraud, when Fraud by its own definition wasn't committed? To Commit Fraud, you must have financial or personal gain, and in my evidence, I have shown I received exactly what I was entitled to through the program, and not a penny more.

17.

7th-amendment-right-to-jury-trial