The petitioner was not charged with aiding and abetting in counts 11-14 but the court allowed the jury verdict on those counts based upon an admittedly erroneous jury instruction. Therefore, should the convictions in counts 13-14 also be Vacated seeing that the consecutive sentence was derived from the origins! portion and he has already served the 10 Yr consecutive counts?

Whether the convictions on counts 13-14 should be vacated due to erroneous jury instructions, given that the 10-year consecutive sentence was derived from those counts