1. That, the lower court (and-or previous appeals court) have decided a legal matter in error, and in conflict with State and Federal Law.

2. That, (as "defendant" ) in the most recent case (USDC Cent. Dist CA, 2:20-cv-04443), -1 have in violation of my Constitutional Rights, and applicable State and Federal Law, Code, Procedure, - been denied the ability to call witnesses, take depositions, go to trial. or any other form of discovery. I am not even being allowed to SPEAK, in my own defense.

3. That, I have been illegally ordered to (pay some $30,000 in legal fees to the respondents) , and (have been ordered by the court to (remove valid filed UCC-1 liens, or other liens violations of my Constitutional, rights to freedom from illegal search and seizure, freedom from harassment (and by the government).

4. That, the court in all actions, has (through just error or bias), has denied me (the right to seek redress via the court, to right civil wrongs, and to be heard at all on valid claims), and thusly denied and violated itself, my rights under the _ in violation of FRCP, USC, Civil Rights Act of 1968 (25 U.S.C. § 1301-1304 , U.S. Constitution and (Amendments 1-11), and all applicable State and Federal Law.

5. That, the (United States Court of Appeals), has previously (As per Rule 10 (a) "so far departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings, or has sanctioned such a departure by a lower court, as to call for an exercise of this Court 's supervisory _power: ")'and-or (As per Rule 10(c), "has decided an important question of federal law that has not been, but should be, settled by this Court, or has decided an important federal question in a way that conflicts with relevant decisions of this Court ").

6. That, judicial immunity and-or state or government sovereignty do not extend to the theft of personal property without just compensation. (Constitution of the U.S.A, 5th, Amendment).

7. That, in violation of my (Constitution of the U.S.A, 5 th, Amendment rights) against self-recrimination, I have been compelled to give testimony against myself.

8. That, (As per Rule 11, "this case is of such imperative public importance as to justify deviation from normal appellate practice and to require immediate determination in this Court "), in accordance with 28 U.S.C. Sub.Ch. 2101(e). And that, (the USCA 9th Circ. CA., does not have the jurisdiction or authority to (deal with the problems that legally exist in these cases/deficiencies involved). And that, the Supreme Court of the United States ' Appellate and jurisdictional authority is both appropriate and not only warranted, but REQUIRED, at this point, -to right a legal wrong(s), and deficiencies legally, which exist in the underlying decisions/cases out of the USDC courts, or previously sanctioned by the appeals courts.

9. That, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sub.Ch. (1651(a)), this writ is in aid of this Supreme Court of the United States ' appellate jurisdiction, and that exceptional circumstances warrant the exercise of this Court 's discretionary powers, and that adequate relief cannot be obtained in any other form, or from any other Court./

That the lower court (and-or previous appeals court) have decided a legal matter in error, and in conflict with State and Federal Law