1. Whether or not the lower court 's denial of the Petitioner 's guaranteed rights under
provision as outlined in the Bill of Rights departed so far from the accepted
standard and published course of judicial proceedings?

2. Whether or not the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit correctly reviewed
the lower court 's denial of Petitioner 's Seventh Amendment in lite of the published
guaranteed right to a trial by jury when affirming the summary dismissal and, if
followed here, would such work a continued manifest injustice, and an ongoing
imprisonment of fundamental liberties all citizens mistakenly believe that they are
to have?

3. Whether the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit correctly affirmed the
lower court 's decision when the denial of Petitioner 's Fifth Amendment due process
clause disregarded this action brought to "Try Title " . While being faced with
Respondents ' manufactured "Allonge to Note " and "Assignment of Mortgage " that
remain inconsistent with public records and proven by preponderance of evidence
to be a fraud?

4. Whether or not the lower court supported this ongoing violation of Petitioner 's
equal protection right and the freedom to be heard when the record show Petitioner
has been repeatedly and systematically denied access to the courts and, if followed
here, would such work a continued manifest injustice and oppression against
clearly established law?

5. Could a reasonable minded, ordinary person off the street, if given the facts and
evidence contained herein that made the record conclude that the U.S. Courts have
openly displayed biasness, partiality and prejudice with complete disregard to the
Petitioner 's basic constitutional and human rights.

6. Does the Supreme Court of the United States not say that, "the due process clause
entitles a person to an impartial and disinterested tribunal ... without being denied
the opportunity to be heard?

7. Did the lower court 's affirmation deny due process clause when the MERS '
assignment went against public records, contradicts the opinion and order given
in Lewis v. Bank of NY Mellon Trust Co. 1:16-cv- 11122-FDS?

8. Would the Supreme Court of the United States condone or stand by this Petitioner
not being allowed to explain himself in a meaningful way should be deemed a
violation of right to enjoy the fundamental right, leaving a party to be affected by
a personal judgment must have his day in court, and an opportunity to be heard?

Whether the lower court's denial of the Petitioner's guaranteed rights under the Bill of Rights departed from accepted judicial standards